Holy Rollers Button

Holy Rollers is now available as an eBook with lots of extras for a measly $4

Amazon.com

iTunes

Search edmundcreffield.com

Home    Chapters    Articles    Asylum Records    Brainwashing    Hymns    Contact

Creffield and the Holy Rollers made page one headlines from 1903 to 1907. When I was researching Holy Rollers: Murder and Madness in Oregon’s Love Cult I spent months transcribing hundreds of articles. I’m not sure why I was so obsessive. Maybe it was my way of immersing my self into a cult without joining one. Anyway, I’m posting them all for those who are really interested in the story, or are interested the history of journalism, or are interested in how a scandalous story played out in the "media" in a by gone era. Since I no doubt made typos and unconsciously corrected papers' typos, these web pages should not be cited in anything serious (e.g. your dissertation). For such projects they should only be used as starting points and you should refer to the original sources. If you want a shorter version of the story, buy my book. Enjoy.

September 22, 1906: Where is This Thing to End!

 

Seattle Daily Times 9/22/1906 p6

Where is This Thing to End!

 

Not long ago a woman shot her brother in the principal passenger station of this city with a revolver which she had purchased a short time before. She was accompanied by another woman who had made with her, according to their own statements, full preparations, in the twenty-four hours preceding the committing of deliberate murder.

 

Both women gave very clear accounts of what they had done and why they did it. The explanation was that the man they had killed had himself shot down in the streets of Seattle a man whom one or both of them loved. This would afford, to most persons, a good enough reason for the committal of a crime for people of a vindictive temperament. On its face it would not argue insanity.

 

The community, horrified by recent crimes, was glad to see these people immediately locked up. Nevertheless, while they were awaiting trial and were under strict confinement, there was a sudden movement to have them tried for insanity. This movement was not participated in by the public prosecutor. He, on the contrary, resisted it.

 

The officers sworn to execute the laws believe that these people should be tried for crime. If found innocent, they can go free, or if found insane on the criminal trial, they will be released and then an insanity charge be preferred against them. But, at present, being charged with crime, they must answer to trial like any other citizen.

 

As the law permits, on the trial of a crime, the defense of insanity, the average citizen will ask why these people were not put upon trial and left to set up then the defense of insanity. This natural and proper principle being, in the present instance, violated by Judge Frater, we must turn to the law and ask why. Turning to the law we find that when it is alleged that anybody is insane and is at large, a commission may be had for an examination in lunacy. The closest scrutiny of this law, however, bears no intimation that as to persons charged with crime there is any right whatever to a commission in lunacy before they have been tried for the crime. The commission is plainly intended for insane who have committed no crime, but who out to be confined because insane.

 

The commission, however, was appointed by Judge Frater over the protest of the prosecuting attorney. This commission was not made up of physicians eminent in the community, even if that could be any excuse for the formation of such a board. How was this commission formed. Was it composed of physicians well known in this city? Why, several of the commission were men whose names are almost unknown in this community. Is it any wonder the decision of a board thus formed and thus conducted does not meet with the approval of the people of this county.

 

Next, we find that the inquiries of the commission were secret. The public prosecutor was not allowed to come in and dispute the fact that these people were insane. He was rigidly excluded from participating in the proceedings of the board. The chief witness that testified to their insanity is a noted criminal lawyer who has been busy in our courts defending on the plea of insanity criminals charged with murder. What a farce!

 

If Judge Frater’s new system is to be carried out, it now follows that as soon as a man is committed for crime and is within the walls of a prison awaiting his trial, all that is necessary for his friends to do is call for a commission of insanity. The commission will sit in secret. The public prosecutor, who has tried to bring the criminal at least to trial, will be thrust out of doors and the room packed, if need be, by friends of the accused. Then he is declared insane and may be or may not be committed to a mad house. If he is committed to a madhouse; he may, on subsequent inquiry, immediately be freed on the ground that, though insane at the time the commission found him so, he has ceased to be insane and can be released. For it must not be forgotten that the criminal insane, under our existing laws, cannot be kept confined in the public asylums of the state one day longer than their insanity lasts, and that their friends have the right at any time to have it declared that it has ceased. In addition to this, the warden of the asylum has the right himself to discharge the insane, if in his opinion, he has ceased to be out of his mind.

 

We have already drawn attention to what the statute is. When anybody is at large and charged with insanity, not with crime, but with insanity, he may be tried for insanity, but once he is charged with crime and apprehended for it, neither the law nor the policy of the law permits such a thing as his trial to be avoided in the scheme that has lately been put in practice.

 

We are glad to perceive that the prosecuting attorney will take the most vigorous steps in his power to avoid this outrageous abuse of justice. If her were not doing so already, The Times would use every exhortation in its power and leave no stone unturned to have so dangerous a practice at once annihilated.

 

These is too much of this insanity business in criminal trials, and this way of applying it so as to avoid all trial on criminal charge is, so to speak, the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Nobody can or will submit to it any longer.

 

This community is sick and tired of this insanity plea being made every time cold-blooded murder is committed. Let the officers of the law bring to a speedy trial the murderers that now fill our county jail awaiting trial. If found guilty, let the criminals be punished summarily as the law requires. This is the only way to destroy the epidemic of murder that pervades our atmosphere. Until this is done, no man is safe from the assassin’s hand, even in his own home in the midst of his own family.

 

 

Seattle Post Intelligencer 9/22/1906 p1

Miller Objects to Board’s Report

Prosecutor Disagrees With Creffield-Mitchell Insanity Commission. Statement by Defense. Authority Upon Which Ruling Was Made Is Almost Parallel Case.

 

Mrs. Maud Creffield and Esther Mitchell are likely to be taken across the state lines into Oregon within the next few days. In order to prevent such action, the prosecuting attorney’s office in King County must speedily secure from the Supreme Court at Olympia a writ of prohibition against the execution of Judge Frater’s order in pursuance of the findings by the commission that the two women were insane.

 

This was made plain during the morning session of court yesterday when Deputy Prosecuting Attorney John F. Miller appeared and made a plea in favor of trying the two women for the crime charged against them and against the action of the commission which found them insane after a number of days of examination. as yet the women are in the county jail and there they will remain until the prosecutors have had an opportunity to carry out their plans to place the matter in the hands of the higher court. Up to this time Mr. Mackintosh has not stated what action he will pursue in the matter. When court opened yesterday morning, A. E. Clark, attorney for Esther Mitchell, asked that the case against the young women be stricken from the trial docket, and this was granted without further opposition from the prosecutor than had already been made. Then Mr. Miller arose and declared, in no mild terms, that he believes the commission knew what its findings would be after the first day’s hearings; that the trial judge had not adhered to the statutes governing the cases and that the attorneys interested in the matters had been allowed to take no part in the proceedings. In brief, Mr. Miller said:

 

PROSECUTOR OBJECTS

 

“Regarding the report that has been filed in the cases at hand, I must say that as far as myself individually, and the prosecuting attorney’s office is concerned, we are astounded. I am not only astounded, but inexpressibly surprised that the laws of this state for the protection of our lives and people can be set aside and criminals can avoid the consequences of their crimes on any such subterfuge as in this case. Neither the prosecuting attorney’s office nor other attorneys interested in this case were allowed a voice in the proceedings, and secret sessions were held. No one knows what transpired, but I do know that from the first to the last from the character of the words used by the commission, I feared the results of the inquisition.

 

“This commission has not only usurped all the rights of counsel, but has usurped the judicial functions of this court without any authority on earth, according to the statutes.

 

“The statute declares that the judge shall examine the charge, but there was not one hour that the court was present at the hearing. Not one question was asked by your honor, nor was your honor present at the sessions.”

 

COURT INTERRUPTS

 

At this point Mr. Miller was interrupted by Judge Frater and he stated in reply to assertions of the prosecutors to the effect that secret meetings were held, that at the beginning of the hearing if at any time the partied to the hearing were not satisfied they might ask to examine the witnesses. Mr. Miller denied that he had ever heard such instructions. In closing the prosecutor said:

A witness comes before the commission and says: ‘I know I violated the law, I know it was wrong to take a man’s life. I knew and expected to be arrested. I am willing now to suffer the penalty, but I am satisfied. I don’t care.’ It is your honor’s privilege, if you find these people are fit subjects to be incarcerated in the insane asylum to have them deported to Oregon. Your honor must obtain this from the facts and testimony. From the facts and testimony in this case, your honor, we simply demand that this case be conducted in the ordinary and usual manner, and that they be not deported.”

 

Here Mr. Miller was again interrupted by the court, who stated that he is satisfied with the testimony and the findings and that the women would be transported to Oregon if he was not prohibited from doing so. He stated further that the prosecuting attorney’s office is at liberty to proceed in any legal way it sees fit, and that no haste will be exercised by the court in getting the prisoners out of the state. Attorneys for the defense then arose to reply to Mr. Miller’s statements, but were denied the privilege. Later, A. E. Clark, attorney for Esther Mitchell, in speaking of the remarks of the prosecutor said:

 

DEFENDANT ATTORNEY SPEAKS

 

“I was surprised at the outburst of the prosecuting attorney. Many of the statements made by him in court this morning are lacking in foundation or fairness, and should not be allowed to go unchallenged. At the opening of the hearing before the commission representatives of the state and the defense expressed themselves as satisfied with the personnel of the board. Mr. Miller said this morning that the representatives of the state were not permitted to take part in the examination. As a matter of fact, at the opening of the commission the court stated that both sides would be given a full opportunity to ask any questions they desired and were requested to produce all evidence possible bearing on the case. He further stated that the attorneys would be given full opportunity to give such aid and offer such suggestions as they desired. Repeatedly during the hearing the prosecutor offered suggestions and questions to be propounded, and both sides were given the same opportunity.

 

“It is claimed that the commission held secret meetings. This was done in order to make physical examinations to discuss matters of delicacy and to bring out evidence which it was seen could not be secured otherwise. To show the attitude of the prosecutor to this method of procedure it is necessary to state that he himself, specifically requested that the testimony of physicians called by him be given without even the court stenographer present. Mr. Miller was the only one of the attorneys interested in the case who took the stand and testified in the matter, and while testifying he declared that if the defendants indulged in the practices testified to by other witnesses they evidently were suffering from a diseased mental condition. At no time did the prosecutor raise an objection before the commission, and it appears to me very remarkable that he should at this late date make the discovery that the affair was not carried on as it should have been. I believe that everyone who attended the hearing of the cases, I will not even except the prosecutor, is firmly satisfied that the women are insane.

 

WOULD PROHIBIT TRIAL

 

In speaking of the cases W. A. Holzheimer, attorney for Mrs. Creffield, said:

“While I will not state as an absolute fact at this time that such action will be taken, yet it appears to me that it would be much more sensible that a writ of prohibition would lie preventing the state from trying two insane persons than for the state to attempt to prevent the court from disposing of the cases as he declares he intends to do. In following the law, and the commission as appointed, for the commissioners are officers of the court whose findings must be legal ones, and they become an order of the court. If this commission had found the people sane it would not preclude the court from trying them for murder, but finding them insane, there is no law that will allow of their being tried.”

 

One of the members of the commission who examined the two women stated to a reporter for the Post-Intelligencer last night that one of the many authorities upon which the commission based its report bears so directly on the subjects as to give the idea that the opinion might have been based on the exact cases in question. This authority, “Berkeley on (illegible) Mental Diseases,” says in speaking of paranoia, the disease which the commission found the women to be suffering:

 

MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

“Women are more frequently affected than men. In youth the patients are more noticeably deficient; they are apt to run after fancies or are terrified by night visions. Often they undertake long fasting, attend revival meetings, become excitable and uncontrollable. • • • To attend churches and listen to exhortations is to them the elixir of life. No reasoning can undermine their foundations, and although opposition and ridicule may for the moment make the patient doubt the correctness of their conceptions, certainty returns after an hour of reflection. These persons support their illogical misconceptions by diligent reading of the Bible, misapplying passages to their individual aims. • • • The slightest opposition calls forth the powers of wrath and the opposer is denounced as the child of the devil. • • • Patients of this class are, as a rule, found unbearable and soon find their way behind the walls of an institution. There the delusions continue and the loss of liberty is regarded as a consequence of their holiness and the institution as a place of martyrdom. • • • Comparatively few of these patients are really dangerous as long as they are unopposed, though occasionally one receives the command of God to destroy the life of some sinful individual. • • • The medical treatment of this form of paranoia is, so far as any hope of cure is concerned, without avail.”

Holy Rollers

Buy Holy Rollers: Murder & Madness in Oregon's Love Cult as an eBook for a measly $3.99 or get an autographed paperback for $15.

Holy Rollers is a story that has everything a good read should have: sex, religious fervor, mass insanity, the downfall of prominent families, murder and sensational court trials.

And it's all true.

John Terry, the Oregonian's 'Oregon's Trails' columnist says of the book: "A dandy piece of research and a good read. Lots more stuff than I was aware of. It deserves an audience"

Amazon

Amazon
$3.99

iBook

iBook
$3.99

Nook

Nook
$3.49

Kobo

Kobo
$3.99

Scribd

Scribd
$3.99

Copia

Copia
$3.99

Holy Rollers Paper Back

Get an autographed paperback for $16.95 (that includes postage and handling for U.S. addresses)

Want to write a check instead of using a credit card? I'm trusting. e-mail that you want the book and I'll send you a copy. You don't send a check until you get the book with an invoice.

Theresa (T-) McCracken, 890 North Bayview, Loop Waldport, Oregon 97394 (541) 563-3112

***

Home    Chapters    Articles    Asylum Records    Brainwashing    Hymns    Contact

Top of Page

FBI Anti Piracy SealThe unauthorized reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by fines and federal imprisonment.

edmundcreffield.com

Newspaper Articles about Creffield & the Holy Rollers

1897-1899:Local Lore, News Of Corvallis and Vicinity Told in Brief B. C. (Before Creffield)

1900:Holy Rollers' Lives Before Creffield

1901:Holy Rollers' Lives Before Creffield

1902:Holy Rollers' Lives Creffield

January 18, 1903: Fred Mitchell Attempts Suicide

June 10, 1903: Salvation Army Major Deserts and Joins the Holy Rollers

October 31, 1903: Zealot Worshipers Burn Furniture, Dogs & Other Things

November 2, 1903: Fanatics In Court

November 3, 1903: Had Promise of Tar and Feathers

November 4, 1903: Flight of The Apostles

November 5, 1903: Once-Esteemed Family No Longer Has the Sympathy of the Community

November 6, 1903: Rollers Take On New Life

November 7, 1903: Is Creffield Back?

November 11, 1903: “Apostle” Creffield Still Under Cover

November 24, 1903: Girl of Sixteen Almost Insane

November 25, 1903: In Pursuit of Creffield

November 27, 1903: The Lord May Starve Them

November 28, 1903: Holy Rollers Receive Unwilling Baptism

December 7, 1903: Demented Woman Suffers

December 8, 1903: Hurt Seen In Portland

December 11, 1903:Holy Rollers Roll Into Eugene Church

December 21, 1903:Holy Roller Victim Worse

December 22, 1903: Linn County Holy Rollers

December 23, 1903: Is Crazy Now

December 29, 1903: Holy Rollers’ Not Liked at the Dalles

December 30, 1903: Owner of Property Refuses to Permit Séances

January 6, 1904: Holy Rollers Tarred and Feathered

January 9, 1904: Their Welcome Departure

January 12, 1904: Editorial Comment: “Put yourselves in our place!”

January 13, 1904: Where Brooks Went

January 19, 1904: Our Brainy Contemporaries

January 25: Holy Rollers’ in Hobo Camp Life

February 1, 1904: Camp In Linn County Is Broken Up By Officers

February 6, 1904: How They Tell The Holy Roller Story In Far Off Scotland

February 11, 1904: Medium Mystify Corvallis People

March 1, 1904: The “Holy Rollers” Offend Humanity

March 16, 1904: Holy Rollers to Be Arrested on Serious Charge

March 17, 1904: Where is the Apostle?

March 21, 1904: Reward For Creffield's Capture

March 23, 1904: Fugitive Creffield

March 28, 1904: Reward is Offered

April 1, 1904: “Holy Roller” Chief Very Badly Wanted

April 18, 1904: Holy Roller High Priest Is Seen

April 29, 1904: Urania Seeley is Arrested

May 2, 1904: Frank & Mollie Hurt are Committed to the Asylum

May 4, 1904: Maud Hurt-Creffield & Sophia Hartley are Committed

May 7, 1904: Attie Bray &Rose Seeley are Committed

June 11, 1904: Attie Bray Escapes

June 17, 1904: Mae Hurt is Committed

June 29, 1904: Sarah Hurt is Committed

July 22, 1904: Holy Roller on Death Row

July 29, 1904: Creffield Found Half Dead Under Hurt’s House

July, 30 1904: Armed Guards Protect Creffield

July, 31 1904: Corvallis Could Not Raise a Mob

August 1, 1904: Creffield says, "I am Elijah"

August 2, 1904: Creffield Does Not Dislike Prison

August 4, 1904: Creffield Says He Is Entirely Purified

August 5, 1904: He Does Nothing Unless Directed by God

August 6, 1904: Creffield Believes in Satan and Eternal Punishment

August 9, 1904: No Flowers For Creffield

August 13, 1904; The Holy Rollers And The Man Who Made Them

August 16, 1904; Creffield Reward Will Be Returned

August 19, 1904: Followers in Asylum Stick To Faith

August 23, 1904: Creffield Will Fight His Own Case

August 28, 1904: Creffield Destroys His Revelations

September 16, 1904: Creffield is Guilty

September 21, 1904: Holy Rollers go in and Out of the Asylum

March 22, 1905: Prison Life Of Joshua Creffield>

April 8, 1905: Life In Corvallis Returns to Normal

December 12, 1905: Frank & Mollie Hurt Have a Baby Girl

April 24, 1906: Creffield Establishes a Camp Near Waldport

April 30, 1906: Donna Starr Leaves Children to go to Her Spiritual Love, Joshua Creffield

May 1, 1906: Creffield Takes Credit for The San Francisco Earthquake

May 3, 1906: Creffield In Fear Of His Life

May 7, 1906: Holy Roller Shot Down Like A Dog

May 8, 1906: Medal to Be Given Mitchell in Recognition of His Killing

May 9, 1906: Oregon Prosecutor Would Aid Mitchell

May 10, 1906: Shows No Emotion At Husband’s Grave

May 11, 1906: Bail Is All Ready

May 12, 1906: Mitchell Denied Bail

May 13, 1906: Creffield is Due To Rise Today

May 14, 1906: Creffield’s Widow Watches At Grave

May 15, 1906: Corvallis Starts Fund for Defense of Mitchell

May 16, 1906: Holy Rollers Starving Near Heceta Head

May 17, 1906: Public Sentiment Favors Mitchell

May 18, 1906: Creffield Railed in Vermont

May 19, 1906: Mitchell to Enter Plea of Not Guilty

May 27, 1906: Joshua Says Not to Worry

June 1, 1906: Morris Claims Mitchell Rid World of a Fiend

June 16, 1906: Prosecution and Defense are Making Last Preparations

June 19, 1906: Many Witnesses For Mitchell

June 24, 1906: Trial Will Cost Taxpayers Ten Thousand Dollars

June 25, 1906: George Mitchell on Trial For His Life

June 26, 1906: Mitchell Jury is Selected With Care

June 27, 1906: Mitchell Trial Held Up By Squabble

June 28, 1906:  Jury is Secured to Try Mitchell

June 29, 1906: Trial is Now on in Earnest

June 30, 1906: Mrs. Creffield's Testimony

July 1, 1906: Creffield’s Ghost Controls His Flock

July 2, 1906:  Esther Mitchell on Stand Refuses To Aid Brother

July 3, 1906: Hurt Tells of Debauched Wife and Debased Sisters

July 4, 1906: Creffield’s Unsavory Record Presented to the Jury

July 5, 1906: Expected Admissibility of Evidence Will Arouse Controversy

July 6, 1906: Others Testify They Wished to Kill Creffield

July 7, 1906: Insanity Expert on the Witness Stand

July 8, 1906: Plan To Revive Holy Rollerism

July 9, 1906: Killing of Judge Emory May Effect Mitchell

July 10, 1906: Mitchell Case Goes To Jury

July 11, 1906: Not Guilty

July 12, 1906: General Rejoicing at Mitchell’s Acquittal

July 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Kills Her Brother!

July 14, 1906: Mitchell Boys Are Done With Esther

July 15, 1906: Hurt Will Come to Aid of His Daughter

July 16: 1906: Will Mortgage His Home for Daughter

July 17, 1906: Let’s Think When We Talk

July 18, 1906: Mrs. Starr’s Life Threatened

July 19, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Weeps in Jail

July 20, 1906: George Mitchell’s Attorney Offers Aid to Murderesses

July 21, 1906: Mitchell Boys to Stand by Esther

July 22, 1906: Hurt Thinks Both Women Are Insane

July 23, 1906: Frater Favors a Commission of Alienists

July 24, 1906: Mackintosh Will Oppose Calling Commission

July 26, 1906: Is Reconciled to Holy Roller Wife

July 27, 1906: Holy Rollers Seek Home in Wyoming

July 28, 1906: Mitchell Juror is Insane

July 30, 1906: Esther Will Deny Committing Murder In The 1st Degree

July 31 1906: Esther Mitchell Says Not Guilty

August 1, 1906: Relatives to Help Esther Mitchell

August 4, 1906: Creffield Greatly Hurt True Religion

August 6, 1906: Mitchell Boys in Drunken Row

August 8, 1906: St. Louis Woman Coming to Convert “Rollers”

August 12, 1906: Esther Mitchell Close to Death from Typhoid

August 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Not Seriously Ill

September 1, 1906: Four Charged with First Degree Now in County Jail

September 10 1906: To Examine Minds of Slayers

September 12, 1906: Hurt Thinks His Daughter Insane

September 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Objects to Help

September 14, 1906: Women Not Agitated

September 15, 1906: Mrs. Creffield’s Trial Set for Next Month

September 17, 1906: Mrs. Creffield on Stand

September 18, 1906:  Maud Creffield Anxious to Hang

September 19, 1906: Are They Sane of Insane?

September 21, 1906: Both Women May Go Scott Free

September 22, 1906: Where is This Thing to End!

September 23, 1906: Murders Must Be Tried

September 24, 1906: Must Not Deport

September 25, 1906: Judge Frater is in Very Small Business

September 28, 1906: Insanity Board Not Paid

October 1, 1906: Holy Roller Woman Dies While in Trance

November 9, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Said to Be in Very Nervous State

November 17, 1906: Maud Creffield Dies in the County Jail

November 18, 1906: Death May End a Hypnotic Spell

November 19, 1906: Reviews Findings in Examination of Brain

November 20, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Killed Herself with Poison!

November 21, 1906: Poison Is Found In The Stomach Of Mrs. Creffield

November 22, 1906: Esther Says Maud Did Not Kill Herself

December 4, 1906: Washing Dirty Linen

December 17, 1906: Sad Christmas For Holy Roller

February 21, 1907: Esther Mitchell Goes to Asylum

April 30, 1907: Esther Mitchell Still Believe in Creffield & His Return

April 6, 1909: Esther Mitchell Leaves Asylum

April 9, 1914: Esther Mitchell Marries James Berry

August 3, 1914: Esther Mitchell is Dead By Own Hand

1953 Stewart Holbrook's Murder Without Tears

1951 Startling Detective Magazine: Nemesis of the Nudist High Priest

A List of All the Articles

***

Sample Chapters from Holy Rollers:
Murder and Madness in Oregon's Love Cult

***

The Cast of Characters
Photos and Bios of the Holy Rollers

***

Holy Rollers' Asylum Commitment Papers

***

Info for Book Groups

Book Reviews

***

1903 to 1907 Newspaper Articles About the Holy Rollers

1906 Editorial Calling for Gun Control
After Multiple Murders Involving the Holy Rollers

Stewart Holbrook Holy Rollers Article

Advertisements from 1893 to 1913

***

Oregon Insane Asylum
Where the Holy Rollers Were Committed

Creffield, Brainwashing & Thought Reform

Early Cases of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

1906 Autopsies Of Holy Rollers
Forensics Before CSI

Holy Roller Bizarre Divorce Decree
Hartley describes trying to kill his wife's lover

***

Comedians on Edmund Creffield

The Shadow Testament
A Play About The Holy Rollers

How the Fire Fell
A Movie About The Holy Rollers

***

Life in Corvallis in the early 1900s

Life in Waldport, OR in early 1900s

Heaven's Gate

Facts & Stats about 1906
And How The Holy Rollers Measured Up

Oregon State Penitentiary
Where Creffield Was Incarcerated

***

Info about Cults

Could you ever be lured into joining a cult?

Share your thoughts about, and experiences with, cults

***

Creffield's Preachings

Creffield Vs. Crefeld

The Salvation Army Opening Fire in 1886

Holy Roller Theology

Reverend Knapp's Bible Songs of Salvation & Victory
Songs Sung by the Holy Rollers

***

About the Authors

Theresa (T-) McCracken

Robert B. Blodgett

In addition to writing, McCracken is a cartoonist.

To see some of her 'toons, go to the Home of McHumor Cartoons mchumor.com

McCracken's Blog

email
email logo

Snail Mail
Theresa (T-) McCracken
890 North Bayview Loop
Waldport, Oregon 97394

(541) 563-3112

HOME of
www.edmundcreffield.com

copyright by
Theresa (T-) McCracken