Holy Rollers Button

Holy Rollers is now available as an eBook with lots of extras for a measly $4

Amazon.com

iTunes

Search edmundcreffield.com

Home    Chapters    Articles    Asylum Records    Brainwashing    Hymns    Contact

Creffield and the Holy Rollers made page one headlines from 1903 to 1907. When I was researching Holy Rollers: Murder and Madness in Oregon’s Love Cult I spent months transcribing hundreds of articles. I’m not sure why I was so obsessive. Maybe it was my way of immersing my self into a cult without joining one. Anyway, I’m posting them all for those who are really interested in the story, or are interested the history of journalism, or are interested in how a scandalous story played out in the "media" in a by gone era. Since I no doubt made typos and unconsciously corrected papers' typos, these web pages should not be cited in anything serious (e.g. your dissertation). For such projects they should only be used as starting points and you should refer to the original sources. If you want a shorter version of the story, buy my book. Enjoy.

May 11, 1906: Bail Is All Ready

 

George MitchellMorning Oregonian (Portland) 5/11/1906 p6

Bail Is All Ready

Avenger Mitchell Finds Many Friends in Seattle. Judge Is On Record. Defender of His Home Was Quickly Released When He Was Brought Up for Trial Before Judge Frater.

 

SEATTLE, Wash., May 10--(Special.)-- It is significant of George Mitchell’s forthcoming trial that he will have to appear before Superior Judge Frater who has already expressed a judicial opinion of a man who broke up another’s home. Unless the County Attorney secures a change of venue, Mitchell will be tried by Judge Frater, for he sits in the criminal court.

 

When George Beede found Ray McDonald recently consorting with the former’s wife, Beede lay in wait at the rendezvous of the two. McDonald was not killed, but he hovered between life and death for weeks. Finally he recovered and refused to prosecute. In dismissing the case against Beede, Judge Frater delivered a scathing denunciation of McDonald, declaring he instead of Beede ought to have been put on trial. The judicial statements created a sensation among attorneys at the time.

 

 

Seattle Star 5/11/1906 p1 Edmund Creffield

Holy Roller Ruled by Hypnotic Power

Louis Sandell of Louis Sandell, of East Seattle, Says Creffield’s Eye Made women Do What Ever We Wanted--Sister is With Colony in Oregon With Her Husband.

 

That Edmund Creffield, the “Holy Roller” leader who was shot by George Mitchell, held his saw over women by hypnotic power is the firm belief of Louis Sandell, of East Seattle. Sandell’s sister, Mrs. Frank Hurt, is a member of the sect and is now near Corvallis, where Creffield had planned to unite his followers.

 

Sandell is very closely connected with all the parties connected in the “Holy Roller” trouble. Frank Hurt, who is the only male member of the “Holy Rollers,” married Sandell's younger sister, and it was through his influence that she also became a member of the sect. He also influenced Sandell’s other sister, Olive, to go to the “Holy Roller” colony near Corvallis, Ore.

 

TRIED TO SAVE THEM

 

When Creffield was sent to the penitentiary two years ago, Sandell tried to get his sisters out of Creffield’s influence and succeeded in getting Hurt to move to East Seattle, where he has been living until Creffield began to reorganize the “Holy Rollers.”

 

About two weeks ago Hurt complained of illness and told Sandell he was going to leave for his health. Without knowing where Hurt was really going, Sandell allowed his two sisters to accompany him.

 

SYMPATHY FOR MITCHELL

 

Sandell sympathizes with Mitchell, and says that if he was place in the same condition he would have done the same. In speaking of Creffield he says:

“I know many of the people he had under his control, and they were perfectly rational and strong minded people before they met him. It was through his hypnotic powers that he got girls under his control. Creffield has a look that seemed to cast a spell over a person, and one felt more secure the farther away from him While Creffield was in the penitentiary, Hurt and my sister were all right, but as soon as they had seen Creffield, I noticed a change.

 

LEFT TWO WEEKS AGO

“The left two weeks ago. My other sister went with them to be a companion to my married sister. When she left I could see that she was troubled and did not want to go. After she came back two years ago, she told me what an immoral fellow Creffield was, and what a terrible power he had over his followers and the girls especially. The stories concerning their community are all true. Creffield was a beast, and his actions at the colony were only those of a brute.

 

KNEW MITCHELL’S INTENTIONS

In speaking of Mitchell, Sandell said:

“I know Mitchell well. I saw him a week before he took Creffield’s life. Creffield ruined his sister and when he was released from the penitentiary he again got his sisters under he control. I saw the girl two weeks ago, and I know that she was controlled purely by his hypnotism.

 

SEND MONEY TO CREFFIELD

 

“She and several other girls were working in Portland last winter and sending him their earnings. There was nothing else that Mitchell could do. I saw him in the county jail, and he told me he was glad he did the deed, as he would rather suffer in Walla Walla alone than see his whole family ruined forever. As far as the killing is concerned, I know several men who were after Creffield and who would have killed him instantly.”

 

Sandell has not yet heard from his sisters, but he expects that they will come back and live in Seattle.

 

Morning Oregonian (Portland) 5/12/1906 p6

Mitchell Will Ask Bail

Slayer of Holy Roller to Be Arraigned Today.

 

SEATTLE, Wash., May 11--(Special)-- George Mitchell will be arraigned tomorrow morning before Judge Frater on a charge of murder in the first degree in killing “Joshua” Creffield. Will H. Morris, attorney for the young man, will defer pleading until more time has been afforded for an examination of the information, but will at once make an application for bail. This application will be fought by the prosecuting attorney.

 

If Mitchell should be admitted to bail the security will have to be provided by strangers, for the Mitchell family is without means.  Mitchell’s attorney claims that enough assurances of support have been given to lead him to believe there will be no difficulty in raising any reasonable amount. Prominent business men are said to have offered to go on the bond.

Local precedents are plenty for allowing bail, although the laws of the state are rigid and do not contemplate the release of homicides on bonds unless doubt exists as to their guilt of murder in the first degree exists.

 

 

 

Evening Telegram (Portland) 5/11/1906 p8

Has No Need of Manning’s Help

District Attorney’s Offer to Testify for George Mitchell Declined.

 

Kenneth Macintosh, Prosecuting Attorney for King County, has answered District Attorney John Manning’s letter advising him of the moral character of Edmund Creffield, the Holy Roller “prophet” in Oregon, and his request to be permitted to appear before the grand jury or in the trial court on behalf of George Mitchell, who shot the Holy Roller.

 

Commenting on the letter, Mr. Manning said:

“Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh makes light of my communication to him, and winds up by saying that he is surprised that Creffield was not punished here, omitting to note that we sent him to the Penitentiary for one crime, and says that he had not heard of a single recital of a specific instance in which Creffield did wrong. This is to be expected, for the crimes committed by this man were with simple-minded people. They were committed in secret, and the officers could not reach him. There were no witnesses obtainable. Furthermore, the nature of his offense were so unprintable that they have never gained publicity and consequently Mr. Macintosh who never heard of them says so and lets it go at that.

 

“If he will come to Oregon we will relate a tale that will cause him to wonder.”

The letter follows:

SEATTLE, Wash., May 10.-- John Manning, District Attorney, Multnomah County, Portland, Or.: Dear Sir--I am in receipt of your letter of May 8 in regard to the case of State of Washington vs. George Mitchell, in which I have today filed an information charging the defendant with the crime of murder in the first degree. There being no grand jury in session, it is impossible to adopt your suggestion of appearing before such a body in order to relate what you know about the previous conduct of Mitchell’s victim, and, as your testimony in the trial of the case in Superior Court would be inadmissible, being merely of a hearsay nature, the second part of your suggestion is also impracticable. Although I am thus unable to avail myself of your knowledge of some of the circumstances leading up to the perpetration of this murder, I wish nevertheless to thank you for the interest you have manifested in the matter and for your offer of assistance.

 

As citizens of this country, you and I realize that the enforcement of our criminal laws is entrusted to our courts, juries and public officers, and that lynch and mob law and anarchy are the natural and only results of the efforts of individuals to personally avenge real or fancied injuries. There is no security to life or property if the individual can act as attorney, Judge, and jury, and take the execution, not of the law, but of his passions, into his own hands and kill any one who he may determine has wronged either himself or his family, and this, whether his determination is the product of a sane or demented mind, and whether his wrongs are real or merely delusions.

 

As officers of the law, sworn to prosecute crime, you and I realize that it is our duty where we are satisfied that a crime has been committed and that there is sufficient evidence to prove the act, to honestly and vigorously prosecute the offender, and that the moral well-being of the community which we represent is vitally affected by the vigor or laxity with which these efforts to enforce the criminal laws are made.

 

The defendant Mitchell, with deliberate and premeditated malice, shot Edmund Creffield in the back and the laws of this state constitute that act murder in the first degree, and do not accept as a justification for it the facts and circumstances which Mitchell and his friends allege up to the shooting, even if such facts and circumstances are true as reported by those people. Being sure that this act was done, and that the witnesses to it are available, it became my duty to file an information charging Mitchell with murder, and this I have done; and it will become my further duty to prosecute the defendant fearlessly and vigorously, which I shall do. I cannot and will not presume that a jury of 12 men of the citizens of this county will do other than observe honestly the oaths which they take when they are sworn to try the case, and, observing these oaths, return a verdict in accordance with the law and the evidence, which in this case should mean a verdict of conviction.

 

Knowing, as I do, the vigor with which you direct and prosecute crime, and the moral fiber of the citizens of Oregon, it seems remarkable to me that, if the deceased Creffield was guilty of all these atrocious outrages of which he is now accused, he was not prosecuted in your state and convicted. I am loath to believe that, if the things which are now laid at this man’s door were committed by him, your officers were unable to suppress those acts.

 

There has been a great deal said in the papers in regard to this crime, and your letter also contains a good many generalities; but I have yet to hear the recital of any specific act which would justify me in believing that Creffield was really guilty of revolting crimes.

 

Thanking you again for your kind offer in this case, I remain, yours truly,

KENNETH MACKINTOSH

Lincoln County Times (Waldport) 5/11/1906 p1

A couple of Holy Rollers, the remnant of the late Creffield’s outfit, which was camped for awhile near Ocean View, this county, passed valley ward yesterday morning--going home, no more to roll--let us hope.

 

Corvallis Gazette 5/11/1906 p4

O. V. Hurt arrives home Wednesday night from Seattle.

 

Lincoln County Times (Waldport) 5/18/1906 p1

The Prevailing Opinion

 

HARLAN, Or., May 11,/1906.

“In the death of Creffield society has been rid of a dangerous character, and yet the manner of his taking off was [NOT] brutal and cowardly.” If we have a “varmint” of any kind that is preying on our sheep and goats--especially our lambs and kids--we put the hounds on its track and run it down, and then we kill the “varmint” as soon as we get to it. We don’t call the dogs off when we get there and let the thing go and start to run in order that we may shoot it four or five times before we get it killed. “The world abhors a villain; it despises a coward;” therefore, a man who uses his brutal influence over weak-minded women, ruins young girls and breaks up happy homes--why isn’t he the worst coyote on the society rang? And when the law has had its inning and has done no good, and a brother is broken-hearted over the villainous ruination and downfall of his sisters, is it to be wondered that a man would take the law in his own hands and put the villain out of the way? He is to be pitied in being forced to do so. Had young Mitchell tried to escape after killing Creffield, it would have been different; but he does not; he stands face to face with his own danger and says: “Do what you will with me. I have only avenged the wrong done my sisters, who are as dear to me as my own life.” Creffield was forewarned, if he had any conscience, for his every movement was criminal; he needed no other warning. We believe in protecting the purity of our land, and we should honor the man who has the courage to take the chance that George Mitchell has taken, for he knows not what the outcome may be.

 

“The disregard and contempt of law” is NOT growing, if real criminals are punished as they should be. If a jury of twelve men could have convicted Creffield for an act far worse than murder in the first degree, and a judge could have sentenced him to the gallows, without any chance of a reprieved, it would have saved George Mitchell the very thought of doing what he did. Men are not “blood hungry and blood crazy”--only in the fertile brains of a very few individuals--and even they, in some instances, handle one case very rough, while in another they are very lenient. And now, Mr. Reporter man, up her in our little law-abiding neighborhood George Mitchell is not considered either a murderer or a coward; and more than that, we believe if a jury of twelve men could be found in Oregon who would convict a man for such an act, we have a Governor who would reprieve him, if he has the power. This is probably the sentiment in the state of Washington, where young Mitchell “rid society of a dangerous character” from Oregon.

A FATHER

 

HEADLINES IN DIFFERENT PAPERS FOR THE SAME ARTICLE

 

Evening Telegram (Portland) Fri 5/11/1906 p1

Mitchell May Plead Temporary Insanity.

Only Way Necessary Testimony Can Be Introduced Says Mackintosh. He Talks to No One. Answer to District Attorney’s Letter Sent to That Official in Portland.”

 Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh Says That Is Best Defense.

 

Seattle Post Intelligencer 5/11/1906 p5

Insanity May Be Mitchell’s Plea

 

[Telegram Coast Special]

If the predictions of Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh prove true, George Mitchell will plead temporary insanity in the superior court when he is arraigned on a charge of murder in the first degree for killing Franz Edmund Creffield in this city a few days ago. Mr. Mackintosh holds that by making this plea it will be possible for the defendant to get the testimony before the jury which he declares necessary if the young man is to have even the slightest chance of escaping the penalty for his crime. He declares that under the law testimony bearing on the former character or condition of the dead man is not generally admissible, and that in order for it to be placed before the jury a plea of temporary insanity will be necessary. More than this the prosecutor asserts that he is certain that this is the plea that will be put before the court and upon which the case will be fought.

 

Mitchell still remains silent and talks only thru his attorney concerning the case.

 

An information was filed in the superior court yesterday by the prosecuting attorney charging Mitchell with murder in the first degree.

 

Attorney Mackintosh yesterday addressed a letter to District Attorney John Manning of Portland, in Answer to one received by him from that official on the previous day. In it he says:

 

CAN BE NO SECURITY TO LIFE

 

“As citizens of this country, you and I realize that the enforcement of our criminal laws is entrusted to our courts, juries and public officers, and that lynch an mob law and anarchy are the natural and only results of the efforts of individuals to personally avenge real or fancied injuries. There is no security to life or property if the individual can act as attorney, judge and jury and take the execution, not of the law, but of his passions, into his own hands and kill anyone who he may determine has wronged either himself or his family, and this, whether his determination is the product of a sane or demented mind, and whether his wrongs are real or merely delusions.

 

“The defendant Mitchell, with deliberate and premeditated malice, shot Edmund Creffield in the back, and the laws of this state constitute that act murder in the first degree and do not accept as a justification for it the facts and circumstances which Mitchell and his friends allege led up to the shooting, even if such facts and circumstances are true as reported by these people. Being sure that this act was done, and that the witnesses to it are available, it became my duty to file an information charging Mitchell with murder, and this I have done, and it will become my further duty to prosecute the defendant fearlessly and vigorously, which I shall do.

 

WOULD MEAN CONVICTION

 

“I cannot and will not presume that a jury of twelve men of the citizens of this county will do other than observe honestly the oaths which they take when they are sworn to try the case, and, observing those oaths, return a verdict in accordance with the law and the evidence, which in this case should mean a verdict of conviction.

 

“Knowing as I do, the vigor with which you detect and prosecute crime, and the moral fiber of the citizens of Oregon, it seems remarkable to me that, if the deceased Creffield was guilty of all these atrocious outrages of which he is now accused, he was not prosecuted in your state and convicted. I am loath to believe that if the things which are now laid at this man’s door were committed by him, your officers were unable to suppress those acts.”

 

 

Seattle Daily Times 5/11/1906 p1

Mitchell To Be Arraigned At Once

Young Man Whom Prosecuting Attorney Insists Committed Murder in First Degree to Be in Court Tomorrow. Application for Bail to Be Made by Will H. Morris, Trusting to Seattle Sympathizers to Provide the Bonds. Boy’s Family and Friends Intimate Friends Own No Realty in the County and His Freedom Depends on Strangers.

 

George Mitchell will be arraigned tomorrow morning before Judge Frater on a charge of committing murder in the first degree in killing “Joshua” Creffield. Will H. Morris as attorney for the young man, will defer the pleading until more time has been afforded for an examination of the information, but will at once make an application for bail.

 

This application will be fought by the prosecuting attorney, but that is should be granted no one who has seen George Mitchell or who has heard him tell the story of how his sisters were ruined by this man whom he has removed from the community in which he was a danger to almost every weak-minded woman with religious tendencies doubts for a moment.

 

George Mitchell’s family owns no real estate in King County. Indeed, they own little property and have less ready money. They are not the class of people who deal in stocks and bonds. Creffield did not find his victims among the wealthy or among those whom the world classes as “our best citizens.” He chose them among the poorer residents of little Oregon towns in which his predatory efforts were employed.

 

CONFINED WITH CRIMINALS

 

If George Mitchell is freed from the confinement which now makes him an associate of criminals and men with whom he has nothing whatever in common it will be by the friendly act of some man or set of men in Seattle who will back up their oft-spoken sympathy by the substantial although technical backing of a lien upon some of their real estate.

 

It is the desire of Mitchell’s relatives and friends and his attorney that he be released from a confinement in which they in common with a majority of the people of Seattle believe to be unjust. The bond required will be far beyond their means and the application for bail will be made solely with the idea that there are men in Seattle who are willing to take an honest look in the boy’s face as security for the temporary obligation upon their property.

 

Newspaper men, deputy sheriffs and police officers used to judging the character of men from their appearance in such crises as land them behind steel bars, are united in their declarations that, whether Mitchell be guilty of murder or not, he is at least a young man who believes he has done right and is willing to take whatever punishment technical jugglers with the law may be able to impose upon him.

 

The measure of that punishment cannot be taken for may weeks. In the meantime it rests mainly upon the people of Seattle whether Mitchell remains a silent prisoner in the county jail or enjoys his freedom until his trial for a defense of his sisters, which the law terms a crime, shall have been concluded.

 

OLD COUPLE CALL ON HIM

As an instance of Mitchell’s character, according to men who have known him all his life, an old man and woman who happened to be in Seattle on a journey, read in the newspapers of the Creffield case and called at the county jail last night to make sure that the George Mitchell was the boy they knew in Illinois years ago.

 

It was the same boy, and after a short talk with him the old people declared to the jailers that they had known him before he came to Oregon with his family and that the boy, his father and his mother were of the highest character and generally respected in the farming community in which they lived. They extended their sympathy to the young man and offered him such aid as is within their means.

 

This bond which will be required will run into the thousands of dollars. It may be as high as $20,000. It might be as low as $5,000. either of these figures is beyond the reach of Mitchell’s intimates. The men who knew him best are not financially equal to such an emergency. Perhaps no one stranger would be willing to furnish the security for the entire amount, but there should be enough men of property in Seattle to make up the amount which this boy’s act in a matter in which most men of right ideas of living would have done the same has made necessary.

 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney John F. Miller will strenuously oppose the application for bail. He declares that Mitchell is not entitled to liberty. His view of the law leads him to the position that this boy is a murderer pure and simple and entitled to no sympathy. He admits, however, that the motive, if it be properly brought out, may have some weight when the case comes to trial, but believes that the duty of the prosecutor is to leave the verdict to the jury and to present the case in the best possible shape on behalf of the law, which forbids the taking of a human life save by a legalized executioner.

 

“Mitchell will know he has been tried, at least, when he gets through with this,” he said.

 

WILL ARGUE FOR BAIL

 

Mr. Morris, on the other hand, says that he cannot believe bail will be refused in such a case, and will argue the provisions of the constitution which he alleged entitle his client to his freedom to the utmost. He has at present no idea where the bond is to come from, but will proceed with the idea that there are men in Seattle who will not allow young Mitchell to remain in jail a day longer than is necessary.

 

Rev. Myron W. Haynes, pastor of the First Baptist Church, whose argument concerning passed over railroads in the removal of his family to Seattle has made perhaps even better known than the ordinary minister of prominence, has injected his personality into the case by telephoning to Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh his assurances off support on the side of the law. Dr. Haynes will preach a sermon on his idea of the case by telephoning to Prosecuting Attorney Mackintosh his assurances of support on the side of the law. Dr. Haynes will preach a sermon on his idea of the case Sunday night. He considers the taking of a human life unjustifiable in any extreme. In this instance it is a case of a minister of the gospel agreeing with the administrators of the technical law.

 

Mr. Mackintosh says that other men have sent him similar messages of support, but the talk of the streets and in the homes where neighbors gather continues to favor Mitchell.

 

(Next to this is an article “Women To Fight For Right To Ballot, Campaign Will Be Made Before the Next Legislature to Secure Passage of Law Extending Suffrage.”)

 

SAME ARTICLE REPRINTED

Corvallis Gazette 5/11/1906, 5/18/1906, p3 5/22/1906 p4, 5/25/1906 p4, 5/29/1906 p4

To Assist Mitchell.

Seattle Daily Times 5/15/1906 p1

 

Throughout the states of Oregon and Washington there is an intense feeling of sympathy for and endorsement of the action of George Mitchell in slaying Edmund Creffield. Mr. Mitchell is a poor young man and he needs financial assistance. Many of our prominent citizens are taking the initiative and are contributing.

 

“The Gazette” will receive contributions and receipt for the same.

Help the boy in his trouble.

 

Corvallis Gazette 5/18/1906 p3

In response to the above appeal for contributions for the assistance of George Mitchell the Gazette is in receipt of $67, contributed as follows:

Harry Pritchard ...........................$1.00

B. W. Johnson ... ...........................5.00

Cottage Grove Party ..................45.00

W. H. Rickard .................................1.00

Frank W. Hughes, Canyonville ...1.00

I. L. Finlav ........................................1.00

A. B. Alexander ............................. 1.00

John Doe ....................................... 1.00

T. H. Davis ..................................... 1.00

E. E. Wilson ................................... 5.00

I.D. Bodine ..................................... 1.00

S. H. Horton .................................. 1.00

Thos. Bonlden .............................. 1.00

George W. Smith ......................... 1.00

John Doe ....................................... 1.00

Holy Rollers

Buy Holy Rollers: Murder & Madness in Oregon's Love Cult as an eBook for a measly $3.99 or get an autographed paperback for $15.

Holy Rollers is a story that has everything a good read should have: sex, religious fervor, mass insanity, the downfall of prominent families, murder and sensational court trials.

And it's all true.

John Terry, the Oregonian's 'Oregon's Trails' columnist says of the book: "A dandy piece of research and a good read. Lots more stuff than I was aware of. It deserves an audience"

Amazon

Amazon
$3.99

iBook

iBook
$3.99

Nook

Nook
$3.49

Kobo

Kobo
$3.99

Scribd

Scribd
$3.99

Copia

Copia
$3.99

Holy Rollers Paper Back

Get an autographed paperback for $16.95 (that includes postage and handling for U.S. addresses)

Want to write a check instead of using a credit card? I'm trusting. e-mail that you want the book and I'll send you a copy. You don't send a check until you get the book with an invoice.

Theresa (T-) McCracken, 890 North Bayview, Loop Waldport, Oregon 97394 (541) 563-3112

***

Home    Chapters    Articles    Asylum Records    Brainwashing    Hymns    Contact

Top of Page

FBI Anti Piracy SealThe unauthorized reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by fines and federal imprisonment.

edmundcreffield.com

Newspaper Articles about Creffield & the Holy Rollers

1897-1899:Local Lore, News Of Corvallis and Vicinity Told in Brief B. C. (Before Creffield)

1900:Holy Rollers' Lives Before Creffield

1901:Holy Rollers' Lives Before Creffield

1902:Holy Rollers' Lives Creffield

January 18, 1903: Fred Mitchell Attempts Suicide

June 10, 1903: Salvation Army Major Deserts and Joins the Holy Rollers

October 31, 1903: Zealot Worshipers Burn Furniture, Dogs & Other Things

November 2, 1903: Fanatics In Court

November 3, 1903: Had Promise of Tar and Feathers

November 4, 1903: Flight of The Apostles

November 5, 1903: Once-Esteemed Family No Longer Has the Sympathy of the Community

November 6, 1903: Rollers Take On New Life

November 7, 1903: Is Creffield Back?

November 11, 1903: “Apostle” Creffield Still Under Cover

November 24, 1903: Girl of Sixteen Almost Insane

November 25, 1903: In Pursuit of Creffield

November 27, 1903: The Lord May Starve Them

November 28, 1903: Holy Rollers Receive Unwilling Baptism

December 7, 1903: Demented Woman Suffers

December 8, 1903: Hurt Seen In Portland

December 11, 1903:Holy Rollers Roll Into Eugene Church

December 21, 1903:Holy Roller Victim Worse

December 22, 1903: Linn County Holy Rollers

December 23, 1903: Is Crazy Now

December 29, 1903: Holy Rollers’ Not Liked at the Dalles

December 30, 1903: Owner of Property Refuses to Permit Séances

January 6, 1904: Holy Rollers Tarred and Feathered

January 9, 1904: Their Welcome Departure

January 12, 1904: Editorial Comment: “Put yourselves in our place!”

January 13, 1904: Where Brooks Went

January 19, 1904: Our Brainy Contemporaries

January 25: Holy Rollers’ in Hobo Camp Life

February 1, 1904: Camp In Linn County Is Broken Up By Officers

February 6, 1904: How They Tell The Holy Roller Story In Far Off Scotland

February 11, 1904: Medium Mystify Corvallis People

March 1, 1904: The “Holy Rollers” Offend Humanity

March 16, 1904: Holy Rollers to Be Arrested on Serious Charge

March 17, 1904: Where is the Apostle?

March 21, 1904: Reward For Creffield's Capture

March 23, 1904: Fugitive Creffield

March 28, 1904: Reward is Offered

April 1, 1904: “Holy Roller” Chief Very Badly Wanted

April 18, 1904: Holy Roller High Priest Is Seen

April 29, 1904: Urania Seeley is Arrested

May 2, 1904: Frank & Mollie Hurt are Committed to the Asylum

May 4, 1904: Maud Hurt-Creffield & Sophia Hartley are Committed

May 7, 1904: Attie Bray &Rose Seeley are Committed

June 11, 1904: Attie Bray Escapes

June 17, 1904: Mae Hurt is Committed

June 29, 1904: Sarah Hurt is Committed

July 22, 1904: Holy Roller on Death Row

July 29, 1904: Creffield Found Half Dead Under Hurt’s House

July, 30 1904: Armed Guards Protect Creffield

July, 31 1904: Corvallis Could Not Raise a Mob

August 1, 1904: Creffield says, "I am Elijah"

August 2, 1904: Creffield Does Not Dislike Prison

August 4, 1904: Creffield Says He Is Entirely Purified

August 5, 1904: He Does Nothing Unless Directed by God

August 6, 1904: Creffield Believes in Satan and Eternal Punishment

August 9, 1904: No Flowers For Creffield

August 13, 1904; The Holy Rollers And The Man Who Made Them

August 16, 1904; Creffield Reward Will Be Returned

August 19, 1904: Followers in Asylum Stick To Faith

August 23, 1904: Creffield Will Fight His Own Case

August 28, 1904: Creffield Destroys His Revelations

September 16, 1904: Creffield is Guilty

September 21, 1904: Holy Rollers go in and Out of the Asylum

March 22, 1905: Prison Life Of Joshua Creffield>

April 8, 1905: Life In Corvallis Returns to Normal

December 12, 1905: Frank & Mollie Hurt Have a Baby Girl

April 24, 1906: Creffield Establishes a Camp Near Waldport

April 30, 1906: Donna Starr Leaves Children to go to Her Spiritual Love, Joshua Creffield

May 1, 1906: Creffield Takes Credit for The San Francisco Earthquake

May 3, 1906: Creffield In Fear Of His Life

May 7, 1906: Holy Roller Shot Down Like A Dog

May 8, 1906: Medal to Be Given Mitchell in Recognition of His Killing

May 9, 1906: Oregon Prosecutor Would Aid Mitchell

May 10, 1906: Shows No Emotion At Husband’s Grave

May 11, 1906: Bail Is All Ready

May 12, 1906: Mitchell Denied Bail

May 13, 1906: Creffield is Due To Rise Today

May 14, 1906: Creffield’s Widow Watches At Grave

May 15, 1906: Corvallis Starts Fund for Defense of Mitchell

May 16, 1906: Holy Rollers Starving Near Heceta Head

May 17, 1906: Public Sentiment Favors Mitchell

May 18, 1906: Creffield Railed in Vermont

May 19, 1906: Mitchell to Enter Plea of Not Guilty

May 27, 1906: Joshua Says Not to Worry

June 1, 1906: Morris Claims Mitchell Rid World of a Fiend

June 16, 1906: Prosecution and Defense are Making Last Preparations

June 19, 1906: Many Witnesses For Mitchell

June 24, 1906: Trial Will Cost Taxpayers Ten Thousand Dollars

June 25, 1906: George Mitchell on Trial For His Life

June 26, 1906: Mitchell Jury is Selected With Care

June 27, 1906: Mitchell Trial Held Up By Squabble

June 28, 1906:  Jury is Secured to Try Mitchell

June 29, 1906: Trial is Now on in Earnest

June 30, 1906: Mrs. Creffield's Testimony

July 1, 1906: Creffield’s Ghost Controls His Flock

July 2, 1906:  Esther Mitchell on Stand Refuses To Aid Brother

July 3, 1906: Hurt Tells of Debauched Wife and Debased Sisters

July 4, 1906: Creffield’s Unsavory Record Presented to the Jury

July 5, 1906: Expected Admissibility of Evidence Will Arouse Controversy

July 6, 1906: Others Testify They Wished to Kill Creffield

July 7, 1906: Insanity Expert on the Witness Stand

July 8, 1906: Plan To Revive Holy Rollerism

July 9, 1906: Killing of Judge Emory May Effect Mitchell

July 10, 1906: Mitchell Case Goes To Jury

July 11, 1906: Not Guilty

July 12, 1906: General Rejoicing at Mitchell’s Acquittal

July 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Kills Her Brother!

July 14, 1906: Mitchell Boys Are Done With Esther

July 15, 1906: Hurt Will Come to Aid of His Daughter

July 16: 1906: Will Mortgage His Home for Daughter

July 17, 1906: Let’s Think When We Talk

July 18, 1906: Mrs. Starr’s Life Threatened

July 19, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Weeps in Jail

July 20, 1906: George Mitchell’s Attorney Offers Aid to Murderesses

July 21, 1906: Mitchell Boys to Stand by Esther

July 22, 1906: Hurt Thinks Both Women Are Insane

July 23, 1906: Frater Favors a Commission of Alienists

July 24, 1906: Mackintosh Will Oppose Calling Commission

July 26, 1906: Is Reconciled to Holy Roller Wife

July 27, 1906: Holy Rollers Seek Home in Wyoming

July 28, 1906: Mitchell Juror is Insane

July 30, 1906: Esther Will Deny Committing Murder In The 1st Degree

July 31 1906: Esther Mitchell Says Not Guilty

August 1, 1906: Relatives to Help Esther Mitchell

August 4, 1906: Creffield Greatly Hurt True Religion

August 6, 1906: Mitchell Boys in Drunken Row

August 8, 1906: St. Louis Woman Coming to Convert “Rollers”

August 12, 1906: Esther Mitchell Close to Death from Typhoid

August 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Not Seriously Ill

September 1, 1906: Four Charged with First Degree Now in County Jail

September 10 1906: To Examine Minds of Slayers

September 12, 1906: Hurt Thinks His Daughter Insane

September 13, 1906: Esther Mitchell Objects to Help

September 14, 1906: Women Not Agitated

September 15, 1906: Mrs. Creffield’s Trial Set for Next Month

September 17, 1906: Mrs. Creffield on Stand

September 18, 1906:  Maud Creffield Anxious to Hang

September 19, 1906: Are They Sane of Insane?

September 21, 1906: Both Women May Go Scott Free

September 22, 1906: Where is This Thing to End!

September 23, 1906: Murders Must Be Tried

September 24, 1906: Must Not Deport

September 25, 1906: Judge Frater is in Very Small Business

September 28, 1906: Insanity Board Not Paid

October 1, 1906: Holy Roller Woman Dies While in Trance

November 9, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Said to Be in Very Nervous State

November 17, 1906: Maud Creffield Dies in the County Jail

November 18, 1906: Death May End a Hypnotic Spell

November 19, 1906: Reviews Findings in Examination of Brain

November 20, 1906: Mrs. Creffield Killed Herself with Poison!

November 21, 1906: Poison Is Found In The Stomach Of Mrs. Creffield

November 22, 1906: Esther Says Maud Did Not Kill Herself

December 4, 1906: Washing Dirty Linen

December 17, 1906: Sad Christmas For Holy Roller

February 21, 1907: Esther Mitchell Goes to Asylum

April 30, 1907: Esther Mitchell Still Believe in Creffield & His Return

April 6, 1909: Esther Mitchell Leaves Asylum

April 9, 1914: Esther Mitchell Marries James Berry

August 3, 1914: Esther Mitchell is Dead By Own Hand

1953 Stewart Holbrook's Murder Without Tears

1951 Startling Detective Magazine: Nemesis of the Nudist High Priest

A List of All the Articles

***

Sample Chapters from Holy Rollers:
Murder and Madness in Oregon's Love Cult

***

The Cast of Characters
Photos and Bios of the Holy Rollers

***

Holy Rollers' Asylum Commitment Papers

***

Info for Book Groups

Book Reviews

***

1903 to 1907 Newspaper Articles About the Holy Rollers

1906 Editorial Calling for Gun Control
After Multiple Murders Involving the Holy Rollers

Stewart Holbrook Holy Rollers Article

Advertisements from 1893 to 1913

***

Oregon Insane Asylum
Where the Holy Rollers Were Committed

Creffield, Brainwashing & Thought Reform

Early Cases of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

1906 Autopsies Of Holy Rollers
Forensics Before CSI

Holy Roller Bizarre Divorce Decree
Hartley describes trying to kill his wife's lover

***

Comedians on Edmund Creffield

The Shadow Testament
A Play About The Holy Rollers

How the Fire Fell
A Movie About The Holy Rollers

***

Life in Corvallis in the early 1900s

Life in Waldport, OR in early 1900s

Heaven's Gate

Facts & Stats about 1906
And How The Holy Rollers Measured Up

Oregon State Penitentiary
Where Creffield Was Incarcerated

***

Info about Cults

Could you ever be lured into joining a cult?

Share your thoughts about, and experiences with, cults

***

Creffield's Preachings

Creffield Vs. Crefeld

The Salvation Army Opening Fire in 1886

Holy Roller Theology

Reverend Knapp's Bible Songs of Salvation & Victory
Songs Sung by the Holy Rollers

***

About the Authors

Theresa (T-) McCracken

Robert B. Blodgett

In addition to writing, McCracken is a cartoonist.

To see some of her 'toons, go to the Home of McHumor Cartoons mchumor.com

McCracken's Blog

email
email logo

Snail Mail
Theresa (T-) McCracken
890 North Bayview Loop
Waldport, Oregon 97394

(541) 563-3112

HOME of
www.edmundcreffield.com

copyright by
Theresa (T-) McCracken